Russian Veto: A Slap at Many Faces

By Hassan Abdel Hamid

Monday, November 18, 2024, was a pivotal day in the ongoing struggle between the Sudanese Armed Forces, backed by the nation’s patriots, and the terrorist Rapid Support Forces (RSF). On this day, the battlefield shifted to the diplomatic arena, a front no less significant than the physical conflict. By the end of the day, the contours of the diplomatic victory for Sudan’s army and its allies became clear. At the same time, signs of failure and frustration loomed over several local, regional, and international actors.
On that remarkable Monday, the UN Security Council convened to discuss a British-sponsored draft resolution on Sudan. Britain, confident of its success, had expended significant effort to ensure the resolution’s passage, particularly as it holds the Council presidency for November. Behind the scenes, the lobbying and manoeuvring to secure votes were intense, with some parties reportedly pushing hard for the British “conspiracy” to succeed. Yet, Russia’s delegate, demonstrating remarkable diplomatic skill, stood firm against Britain and its allies.
On the same day, U.S. Special Envoy Tom Perriello, representing outgoing President Joe Biden, was in Sudan discussing the same issue debated in New York, albeit with differing details.
What Happened in New York and Port Sudan?
In New York, reports indicated a fierce confrontation between the Russian and British delegates. Britain’s efforts to secure support for the resolution included suspending the consultation session and revising the draft multiple times. Despite these efforts, the outcome was disappointing for Britain and its allies. Out of the 15 Security Council members, 14 voted in favour of the draft resolution. However, the Russian delegate surprised everyone by wielding the veto, leading to its rejection.
Russia didn’t stop at rejecting the resolution. Its delegate launched a scathing attack on Britain, criticizing its policies and actions. The heated exchanges between Russian and British officials became a focal point in global media, with the UN’s website chronicling the tense moments. Russian diplomats unleashed their anger on Britain, accusing it of neo-colonial ambitions.
Developments in Port Sudan
Meanwhile, Tom Perriello’s visit to Port Sudan appeared more like that of a bankrupt merchant attempting to close his accounts before leaving office. Perriello met with various Sudanese officials during his visit, including the Chairman of the Transitional Sovereign Council, his deputy, and the foreign minister. One meeting with Deputy Chairman Malik Agar summarized the sentiment of the Sudanese leadership:
“This visit by the American envoy marks a good beginning for building a new, healthy relationship, particularly because it started in the government’s offices and not in airports, outside Sudan, or through phone calls. This approach serves the interests of both nations.”
Agar did not shy away from addressing the core of the issue, stating:
“The crisis Sudan faces today is the handiwork of Sudanese actors, supported by American and European blessings, along with financial backing from the UAE. If the United States genuinely wishes to end this war, it should leverage its relationship with the UAE to demand an end to its support for the Dagalo militia.”
Agar’s words were as clear as daylight, sharp as a blade, and powerful as bullets — leaving little room for misinterpretation.
The Impact of November 18, 2024
Looking at the events in both Port Sudan and New York, it is evident that Russia’s veto was a blow felt by many parties. Britain, its allies, and those who sought to exploit Sudan’s crisis found their plans disrupted. The day’s events underscored the importance of diplomatic resilience and clarity in navigating complex international challenges.
One must wonder: How many faces and factions received the slap of Russia’s veto on this decisive day?